REGULATORY
Importance of Non-ICER Factors in Cost-Effectiveness Assessment Starting to Resonate with Chuikyo Reps
Members of a key reimbursement policy panel appear to be becoming more and more open to the industry’s call for Japan to look at various benefits that cannot be captured with the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; costs per QALY gained)…
To read the full story
Related Article
REGULATORY
- Panel to Weigh Orphan Designation for Tecartus on December 22
December 17, 2025
- LDP League Formally Urges Male HPV Shots Under NIP from FY2026
December 17, 2025
- Solo Distribution Poses Threats to Stable Supplies, Price Negotiations: Survey
December 17, 2025
- MHLW Drafts Guideline Update, Urges Makers to Factor Distribution Costs into WPPs
December 16, 2025
- MHLW to Add Company-Driven Route to “Specific-Use Drug” Designations
December 16, 2025
Let’s be real: even with the best intentions, AI systems can reflect our own unconscious biases. As Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky famously demonstrated in their groundbreaking work on Prospect Theory, humans are prone to cognitive biases that influence our…





