REGULATORY

Importance of Non-ICER Factors in Cost-Effectiveness Assessment Starting to Resonate with Chuikyo Reps

February 7, 2019
Members of a key reimbursement policy panel appear to be becoming more and more open to the industry’s call for Japan to look at various benefits that cannot be captured with the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; costs per QALY gained)…

To read the full story

Related Article

REGULATORY

By Takashi Ohama

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) appears to be ready to begin post-launch drug price adjustments based on cost-effectiveness assessments (CEAs) for the first time since the system was introduced in April 2019. As price tweaks will be…

By Yoshinori Sagehashi

Biogen’s controversial Alzheimer’s drug aducanumab was filed for Japanese regulatory approval in December. If approved, it will be the first…

Japan’s key reimbursement policy panel on December 20 approved an outline of its FY2020 drug pricing reform next April, with…

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) on November 27 added to the NHI price list Japan’s first biosimilars of Avastin (bevacizumab), Nesp (darbepoetin alfa), and Forteo (teriparatide). The NHI prices of first biosimilars are set at 70% of…

Japan will go ahead with the introduction of a cost-effectiveness assessment (CEA) scheme for drugs and medical devices in April…

By Philip Carrigan

After decades in recruitment, I say from experience that there’s a particular way to attract candidates to a given role. Do it right, and you’ll have talent chasing you. Get it wrong, and you’ll be left listening to the crickets…