REGULATORY
Importance of Non-ICER Factors in Cost-Effectiveness Assessment Starting to Resonate with Chuikyo Reps
Members of a key reimbursement policy panel appear to be becoming more and more open to the industry’s call for Japan to look at various benefits that cannot be captured with the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; costs per QALY gained)…
To read the full story
Related Article
REGULATORY
- Officer Replacement Orders a “Last Resort” under PMD Act: MHLW Official
September 18, 2026
- Japan Panel Sees No Scientific Objection to Capvaxive NIP Addition
September 18, 2026
- Tavneos Blue Letter Action “Too Slow,” MHLW Panel Member Says
September 18, 2026
- Takaichi Tasks Ueno with Charting Growth Strategy for Drug Innovation
September 18, 2026
- Japan HIV, AIDS Cases Rise in H1 after 2025 Lows
September 18, 2026
We had just gotten off a call with a client in Europe, and we’d received a bit of an earful. “Philip,” the client pressed, “what can this candidate bring to us? We know what he does, but what has he…





