REGULATORY
Experts Doubt Necessity of Policy Intervention for LLP-Dependent Companies
Is policy intervention necessary for Japanese drug makers reliant on off-patent brand-name medicines? Many members of the health ministry’s key expert panel appear to doubt it, in the belief that strategies to pursue growth should be uniquely formulated by individual…
To read the full story
Related Article
REGULATORY
- AstraZeneca’s Oral SERD, MSD RSV Antibody Up for Japan Panel Review on May 25
May 12, 2026
- Daiichi Sankyo Wins Japan Approval for MMR Vaccine Mimrit
May 12, 2026
- MHLW Issues Q&A on Conditional Approval System
May 1, 2026
- Panel Backs Proposal to Allow Antibody Drugs Like Beyfortus in NIP
May 1, 2026
- METI Clarifies Naphtha Comments, Reaffirms Medical Priority
April 30, 2026
In the complex landscape of the Japanese pharmaceutical market, the “status quo” is often the safest harbor. But for leaders like Kennet Brysting, former president of Gilead Japan, the status quo is the most dangerous place to stay.Innovation in Japan…





